The Last Stoic

I’m looking at the double helix at the core of our donut. The fluid of the aether is moving around the cylinder in the shape of a double helix. One helix travels down the cylinder while the other helix travels up. We have two forces working in opposition to one another other. What’s going to be the rub?

The double helix moves up and down the latitudes. So far, I’ve summised this is the magnetic field. I’m looking for the electric field which is longitudinal. It is perpendicular to the magnetic field. It appears, I could well find the electric field as something which emerges between the two helices of the double helix. An obvious comparison at this stage is the double helix of DNA.

If we imagine the structure of a double helix as somewhat like a ladder, then DNA has base pairs forming the ladder’s rungs, and the sugar and phosphate molecules forming the vertical sidepieces of the ladder. It’s the rungs, or base pairs which follow the longitudinal axis. A base pair is made up of two complementary, nitrogen rich molecules held together by weak chemical bonds. Two strands of DNA are held together in the shape of a double helix by the bonds between their base pairs. These bonds are formed by hydrogen.

Without hydrogen bonds there could be no life because they hold the double helix of DNA together and this they do by charge attractions. Hydrogen bonds stabilise the structure of proteins and are essential for catalysis. Hydrogen bonds occupy an important role in the core structure of DNA. What role, if any, does hydrogen play in the core of our EMR torus?

Many thanks:
http://www.molecularstation.com/molecular-biology-images/502-dna-pictures/
http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/582dnadoublehelix.html
http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/basics/dna

I hope to grasp a better understanding of electromagnetic radiation. The torus is our magnetic field. With electromagnetic radiation, the electric field is perpendicular (at a right angle) to the magnetic field. The longitudinal axis on our torus is our electric field. This would explain many things about the relationship between the electric and magnetic fields. Of interest, another place where we have found the electric field perpendicular to the magnetic field is on Foucalt’s disc, where the eddy-currents are perpendicular to the applied magnetic lines of force.

Foucalt’s disc uses a DC supply from a battery to power an electromagnet. It is thought that the electric current flowing through the wire produces a magnetic field. It is perhaps, more the other way round. The magnetic field is always there, because the aether is always here. An electric current is the product of where we have managed to induce the aether. This induction of the aether also produces what we percieve as a magnetic field. The longitudinal axis on the outside rim of the torus, moves into the core of the torus. As the longitudinal axis is condensed, the electric field is formed, and we are able to ’see’ it attached to the magnetic field to form electromagnetic radiation.

A coil of wire wrapped around a bar magnet is mimicking the longitudinal axis of our torus. The longitudinal axis being the electric field. The coil of wire elongates the electric field. Rather than simply passing straight through the core of the torus, the electric field’s journey is being stretched out. The core of the conductive wire is acting as the elongated core of the torus. The core of the torus becomes a vortex. We are now falling down the rabbit hole. The torus, with its inner core stretched, is no longer a humble donut-shape, but something more like a rifle-barrel. If you look down into the core of the torus you may well see sinusoidal waves taking shape…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRASn4tcXFE

I thought this next animation sums up where we are right now. You can see the core of the torus being stretched inside the coil. The rings illustrate the longitudinal axis passing through the core of the torus. The rings are perpendicular to the magnetic field, and they represent the electric field….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ez42Xk261o&feature=related

An electromagnet with a moving core, or plunger, is called a solenoid. When electricity is applied the plunger can either be pulled into the coil, or it can be set-up to push the plunger out, depending on the direction of the current. The direction of the current will dictate whether the solenoid is a push or a pull – it cannot be both. Convention states that the direction of current depends on polarity. Unfortunately, I cannot simply say that the direction depends on polarity, because in my Universe, electricity flows in both directions and forms a double helix. It flows from a higher potential to the lower, and vice versa.

The aether moves inside the torus, but perhaps it is better to write that the torus moves inside the aether. An electric field is the core of our torus. The core of the torus is twisted into a double helix. While the aether flows into the core – something flows out – and while the aether flows out of the core – something flows in. This partner is of course the fluid of the aether working in opposition to itself. A vortex is the only way in which a fluid may move through itself. At the openings of the torus, top and bottom so to speak, the fluid flows in both directions. If you map this out – a double helix with a loop either end – you find that one loop flows in a clockwise direction, while the other loop flows in a counter-clockwise direction. I think this offers us a tantalising clue as to why we have polarity.

I’m holding in my hands a skipping rope. I double it over, and give it a few twists to create a double helix. Pulling at opposite ends of the helix, I can see the rope slide elegantly over itself in both directions. It gives the effect of a smooth laminar flow. If this movement is taking place at the speed of light, should we then perhaps expect to find friction? In a vortex, the speed and rate of rotation of fluid are greatest at the centre, and decrease progressively with distance from the centre. This centre acts as the cylinder which the helix coils around. Something’s happening in this centre – but what?

Many thanks:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/solenoid.html
http://bizarrelabs.com/mag.htm http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/sun/atmosphere/sunspot_magnetism.html
http://www.miniscience.com/projects/Solenoid/index.html
http://www.coolmagnetman.com/gallery/imageset.html
http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/vortex.htm
http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe.pdf
http://steelbarrelnews.com/images/gun_barrel_05_lg.jpg

The aether is pouring in and out of the Earth. The Earth, because of its mass, is a cold energy sink which distorts the aether field. This distortion is what we call the Earth’s magnetic field. The magnetic field around the Earth is a torus shape. With a simple bar magnet we can see the cross section of the torus by sprinkling iron filings around a bar magnet. We think of this magnetic field as static, but it is actually moving so incredibly fast it appears stagnant. Life takes on a pretty surreal tangent once you start to question which part of the Universe is really here. Is the Universe the light show that we see, or truly, is it the stuff which we think does not exist?

The aether field is a fluid of latent magnetism. The word latent is derived from the Latin ‘latere’, to lie hidden. Of late, I have become rather fond of the aether, and even more so as I begin to fully understand its implications. It has become harder to seperate matter from energy, and even harder to seperate energy from the aether. Matter reveals itself as a vibration, a twist, in the aether. It is only the mind which creates seperation. Truly, everything in the Universe, and that includes you and me, are One.

The Earth’s magnetic field is a torus shape. The magnetic field is generated by the flow (though it is better to perhaps write vibration), of the aether in and out of the Earth. The Earth acts as a cold energy sink. The magnetic field does not start in the inner core of the planet, but rather, it begins with the latent magnetism of the Universe.

A torus is made up of two circles perpendicular to one another. There is the circle in the ring shape which we percieve as magnetic flux on a bar magnet. The other circle is perpendicular to the first, and follows the outline of our donut-shape. We can find this circle by drawing along the outermost rim of the torus, the longitudinal axis. This circle can then be repeatedly drawn going down into the centre of the donut (you know – the place where it twirls around your finger) and back out the other side.

If you apply this longitudinal axis to a bar magnet, or the Earth’s magnetic field, it develops into an hour glass shape. If you draw it out, you will have two vortices which are stuck to one another by their stalks, and takes on the appearance akin to a dumbell. And I’ve seen this shape before. It’s the same shape which depicts the energy vortices of chakras on the body. These vortices are open at the front and back, so that they can recieve and send energy from the Universe. So it appears our central nervous system utilises vibrations to create a cold energy sink, and it is at these various locations we call chakras. Right now our bodies are sucking-in and blowing-out the aether. It’s a strange feeling is it not ?

https://faculty.digipen.edu/~jhanson/geometry/torus/torus.html
http://www.sacred-texts.com/nth/sotu/sotu08.htm
http://www.wyndwalkerstudio.com/chakras.shtm

A pivoted needle with a scale measuring the dip angle, is nowadays known as “dip needle”. It shows that the magnetic force pulling a compass needle northward is not simply horizontal, but slanted downward, into the solid earth. Some think this is due to the attraction of the needle to a magnetic iron core. I think that this might be evidence of an aether field – an all encompassing invisible fluid – and how it reacts to the enormous conducting mass which is planet Earth.

The magnetic lines of force at the poles of the Earth are vertical due to which the magnetic needle becomes vertical. The magnetic dip at the magnetic poles of Earth is 90 degrees. The lines of force around the magnetic equator of the Earth are perfectly horizontal. So the magnetic needle will become horizontal there. Thus the angle of dip at the magnetic equator of the Earth will be 0 degrees. The angle of dip varies from place to place.

Magnetic field lines are generated by matter as it acts upon the aether field. Matter rolls out on the blanket of aether and creates an energy sink. The Earth likes to suck down electricity. Sparks from a grinding wheel always fly up. Matter acting upon the aether creates such polar opposites as centripetal and centrifugal, top and bottom, up and down, attraction and repulsion, potential energy and kinetic energy; whereas without matter, the aether would remain flawless; to an observer this experience could well be meaningless, because it would quite literally be an experience that can only be described as nothing, nothing perhaps, except consciousness.

The effect of the flow of energy of the aether field around the Earth produces a torus shape – a ring-shaped solenoid. Tori shapes include donuts and inner tubes. It’s our planet’s rubber ring as it bobs in the fluid of the aether. Torus was the Latin name for a cushion of this shape. There’s no doubt this same shape was imitated by Tesla for the design of his resonant transformer – the Tesla Coil. It’s imitating the effect of mass on the aether, and how the flow of energy moves around the Earth. A flow of energy we so often refer to as the Earth’s magnetic field.

The magnifying transmitter is an alternate version of a Tesla Coil. It is a high power harmonic oscillator that Nikola Tesla proposed for the wireless transmission of electrical energy. Tesla’s apparatus is a high-voltage, air-core, multiple-resonant transformer that can generate very high voltages at high frequency. He originally termed it self-regenerative resonant transformer, a term that is no longer in general use. He built one at Wardenclyffe. Local villagers were keen to point out that of equal importance to the tower is that which takes place in the ground beneath it. “From there, they say, tunnels have been built in all directions, until the entire ground below the little plain on which the tower is raised has been honeycombed with subterranean passages.”- The New York Times…27 March, 1904

Beneath the tower, a well-like shaft plunged 120 feet into the ground. Sixteen iron pipes were driven three hundred feet deeper so that currents could pass through them and seize hold of the earth. “In this system that I have invented,” Tesla explained, “it is necessary for the machine to get a grip of the earth, otherwise it cannot shake the earth. It has to have a grip… so that the whole of this globe can quiver.” Was Tesla trying to simulate the ultrasonic vibrations taking place inside the Earth?

There’s one more thing. What exactly is at the core of the torus that surrounds the Earth?

Many thanks:
http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_todre.html
http://www.teslascience.org/archive/descriptions/picture10.htm
http://corrosion-doctors.org/Biographies/TeslaBio-Times.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torus
http://www.antennex.com/prop/prop0607/prop0607.pdf

Magma is molten rock and metal found beneath the surface of the Earth. It is thought that it may exist on other terrestial planets. People commonly think of lava and magma as a liquid, but geologists find that magma is usually a mush – a liquid carrying a load of mineral crystals. We’ve seen in previous posts how comets, whom also carry mineral crystals, may use electrolysis to generate those huge ionic plasma tails. A comet’s tail can be tens of millions of kilometers in length when seen in the reflected sunlight. Comets are very small in size relative to planets. Their average diameters usually range from 750 meters or less to about 20 km. The Earth has a diameter of 12, 800km at its equator. If we were able to look under the bonnet of the planet, so to speak, would we find the same ionic reaction taking place beneath the mantle on a far grander scale?

Scientists know a lot about lava. Lava is the stuff which erupts onto the surface. Magma remains a bit of a mystery to scientists because it is always found beneath the crust, making it difficult to observe. Drillers accidentally hit a pocket of molten rock underneath a working geothermal energy field in Kilauea, on the Big Island of Hawaii. A lucky break for geologists that could allow them to map the geological plumbing that created everything we know as land. Geologists had expected to hit dark molten basalt, because basalt is abundant on the island. Tests of the glass samples found that the material was dacite, an unusual type of magma that is granitic in nature and contains 67 percent of silica. The samples of the magma were found to be “clear and glassy”.

Basalt flows cover nearly 70 percent of the earth’s surface. Basalt contains around 50 percent silica. Silica is a chemical compound also known as silicon dioxide (SiO2). Silica is most commonly found in nature as sand or quartz, as well as in the cell walls of diatoms. Soda-lime glass accounts for 90 percent of manufactured glass. Soda-lime glass contains about 70 to 74 percent silica. Many glasses contain silica as their main component and glass former. A good quality prism is made with quartz – pure silica. Glass optical fibers are almost always made from silica.

Silica is also the most abundant mineral in the Earth’s crust. Although there are few exceptions, the primary constituent of magma is silica. The guy on this site relishes the similarities of glass and magma, and has fun recreating lava flows in the microwave – known affectionately as “the ol’ nuker”. The reactions are possible due to ‘ions’ being trapped in the glass. Have you ever noticed that odd air bubble which sometimes get trapped in a glass?
http://www.ionizationx.com/amasci.com/weird/microwave/voltage2.html

The material that forms magma contains a lot of dissolved gases – gases that have been suspended in the magma solution. As magma decompresses on its journey to the surface, the bubbles grow and approach one another more closely until, eventually, they connect. Volcanic eruptions are thought to be driven by the nucleation and growth of many bubbles within magma. It is known that within gas-charged magmas bubbles grow and shrink by the movement of water in and out of the melt. Researchers have found that the more water there is in the magma, the more likely the volcano is to erupt violently. At depth in the Earth nearly all magmas contain gas dissolved in the liquid, but remember, the samples from Kilauea were found to be “clear and glassy”. The gases had remained dissolved, without forming bubbles.

Degassing is the process of removing small suspended gas bubbles and dissolved gas from a liquid. Before applying epoxy and polyurethane compounds, efforts are made to remove any trapped gases. One popular method is by vibration – the mixture is placed on a vibrating table that assists the bubbles in travelling to the surface. Deep inside the planet there is no surface for the bubbles to arise into. Is it possible that the magma is being vibrated at such high frequencies that gases are forced to dissolve? As magma rises to the surface as lava, the vibration could change, allowing gas bubbles to form. At lower vibrations, it would appear that it becomes possible for hydrogen and oxygen to emerge from the magma as water vapor. Lower vibrations are synonymous with lower heat, are they not?

Oil and water do not mix, or rather, they will not mix without the addition of an emulsifier. Emulsifiers help mix ingredients that would normally seperate – oil and water for example. Examples of food emulsifiers are egg yolk (where the main emulsifying chemical is lecithin), honey and funny enough, mustard, where a variety of chemicals in the mucilage surrounding the seed will act as emulsifiers. Of interest, a mustard seed is the most tightly packed seed of all with no room for air inside.

Ultrasonic waves can also be used to mix oil and water, in a procedure known as ultrasonic emulsification. Ultrasonic waves are similar in nature to sound waves, but occuring at frequencies above 20,000Hz (the approximate upper limit of human hearing). The general principle involved in generating ultrasonic waves is to create some dense material to vibrate very rapidly. Because they can vibrate the particles through which they pass, ultrasonic waves are often used to shake, or even destroy, certain materials. Using this technique, two liquids that normally do not mix with each other (such as oil and water) are made to vibrate until they are blended. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8qHKwiBvhI This technique is also often used to remove air bubbles from molten metals before casting so that the finished piece is free of gas bubbles. Are ultrasonic waves responsible for vibrations inside the planet?

In most applications, ultrasonic waves are generated by applying an electric current to a special kind of crystal known as a piezoelectric crystal. The crystal converts electrical energy into mechanical energy, which in turn causes the crystal to vibrate at a high frequency. In a crystal microphone, air pressure deforms the crystal enough to cause very small voltage changes in the crystal. These voltage changes are amplified and used to record or transmit sounds. One of the most effective piezoelectric crystals is quartz. Quartz is of course pure silica.

Ernst Florens Friedrich Chladni (November 30,1756–April 3, 1827) a German physicist and musician. Chladni was born in Wittenberg. His important works include research on vibrating plates and the calculation of the speed of sound for different gases. For this some call him the “Father of Acoustics”. He also did pioneering work in the study of meteorites, and therefore is regarded by some as the “Father of Meteoritics” as well.

The technique of showing the lines of nodes on vibrating metal plates by strewing sand on them was developed by Chladni. The first mention of the technique is in his book Entdeckungen ueber die Theorie des Klanges, published in 1787. Until the twentieth century the standard method of setting the plates into oscillation was drawing the rosined hairs of a violin bow over the edge of the plate, which was normally clamped at its geometrical center. Today we place a loudspeaker above or below the plate, and adjust the driving frequency until the plate goes into resonance, and the sand on the surface moves toward the nodes.

Anything that vibrates has a natural resonant frequency and will spontaneously begin to vibrate in response to external vibrations that share the same or a similar resonant frequency. This sympathetic vibration is called resonance, which literally means to re-sound, to echo. A common illustration of sympathetic vibration is to sound a tuning fork and bring it close to, but not touching, another fork of the same frequency, which will then begin to vibrate sympathetically.

The frequencies used by Chladni plates begin around 100 Hz, and can range anywhere upto 20,000 Hz (within the frequencies of human hearing). The plates are vibrating in sympathy to something which surrounds us. What exactly? If you sing near the strings of an undamped piano it will respond with sympathetic vibration. Are the vibrations around us damped until we excite them? I suspect that there are ultrasonic waves in the core of the Earth generating a seething mass of vibrations. By vibrating the plates, maybe we are able to resonate with some of those frequencies. This might start to explain those amazing patterns that we see emerging on Chladni plates.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wmFAwqQB0g

What has all this got to do with bubbles?

Many thanks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRQmhIVjh5M&feature=related
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-glass.htm
http://geology.about.com/cs/basics_roxmin/a/aa011804a.htm
http://explorevolcanoes.com/rocksandfeatures.html
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17424425
http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/first-contact-with-inner-earth-5385.html
http://www.cerritos.edu/earth-science/tutor/On-Line_lecture_notes/Volcanoes/Unit_11_Lecture_Magma.htm
http://www.geotimes.org/july04/NN_Marsironcore.html
http://amonline.net.au/geoscience/earth/magmatism.htm
http://wsx.lanl.gov/Publications/wurden-comet-ieee.pdf http://www.phschool.com/science/science_news/articles/when_mountains_fizz.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiber
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass
http://www.astronet.ru/db/xware/msg/1208313
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/sep/07/naturaldisasters.uknews2
http://www.deep-six.com/page70.htm
http://www.scienceclarified.com/Ti-Vi/Ultrasonics.html
http://www.teachersdomain.org/resource/lsps07.sci.phys.energy.chladni/

Forces which oppose gravity interest me, such as magnetic forces found in floating magnets, and the drag forces of a falling object. Another force which can be thought of as opposing gravity is an object’s buoyancy in fluid. I’m trying to remember a kids’ gadget where a ping-pong ball floated in a stream of air. Drag force and buoyancy created by the air pushing up against the ball, oppose the gravitational forces trying to pull the ball down. More specifically, perhaps, drag force can be thought of as opposing the acceleration force, while buoyancy opposes gravity.

The idea of buoyancy was summed up by Archimedes, in what is known as The Archimedes Principle: any object, wholly or partly immersed in a fluid is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object. Our floating ping-pong ball has reached an equilibrium where the three forces of weight, drag, and buoyancy are in perfect balance. I think of floating magnets as buoyant, then I think of a ball out at sea, and then I think of the Earth, bobbing quite merrily, in the fluid that is the aether field.

Normally, the force of weight is always downward. The force of buoyancy is always upward, and is negligible if the object’s density is much greater than the density of the medium. A bit like, I guess, dropping a cannon ball into the sea. The Earth seems pretty buoyant in its relationship with the rest of the solar system. If the Earth is a cannonball, then our aether emerges as a fluid like tar. Perhaps, we can also think of the Earth as a little styrofoam ball drifting out at sea. Though we cannot see it, it appears that the aether field is incredibly dense. Far denser than matter.

If Earth does float in a fluid you would imagine there would be a tell-tale sign of it. I think evidence of it is in the wobbles we see in Earth’s orbit. There are a number of wobbles. The precession of the equinoxes is actually the movement of the Earth’s axis. A complete circuit takes about 25,780 years. Another movement in the earth’s axis is a varying in the tilt of the Earth’s axis. The tilt changes in a cycle lasting 41,000 years. The Earth’s eccentricity also wobbles in a cycle of 92,400 years. Then there is nutation, a tiny wave that repeats itself every 19 years. Cycles and waves, wobbles and nuances, of a ball-all-out-at-sea.

Of note, there is a slight wobble in the way the Earth’s orbit changes in the movement of Earth’s perihelion. Perihelion means the closest point in an orbit; aphelion means the furthest point in an orbit. The Earth’s perihelion moves in a complete circle about the Sun in 21,310 years. Because of this the Earth’s orbit can be visualized as a perpetual spiral, never quite visiting the same place twice in space. If you were able to look down upon the Earth, and you had the patience to sit around for 25,000 years or so, then you’d see a signature being drawn-out in the letter ‘G’.

Many thanks:
http://www.gateway-to-the-universe.org/brent/tourist/earth0.htm
http://www.ancient-wisdom.co.uk/precession.htm

When I worked as a ’sparks’ there was something that would intrigue me. If there was a fault on a circuit where a live conductor touched something which was ‘earthed’, then the fuse would blow. The reason being that, quite literally, the Earth would try to suck all the electricity out of the system, thereby the fuse overheats and cuts the circuit. You see this much more dramatically with wire-fuses rather than circuit breakers, because they often let-off a loud accompanying ‘bang’ and ‘flash’ (not that I was a particularly bad electrician where this happened a lot!). I was always intrigued to know what made the Earth so greedy for electricity.

Tesla once stated that “….the earth behaves like a perfectly smooth or polished conductor.” The ionosphere 100 km above us is also thought of as a conductor. We are taught that the ionosphere is positively charged and the Earth is negatively charged; the difference is about 250, 000 volts. Squeezed between these two conductors is the atmosphere. Air is a poor conductor which makes it an insulator. When an insulator is sandwiched between two conductors, that insulator is known as a dielectric, and the result is a capacitor capable of storing energy as an electric field. Sometimes the atmosphere is referred to as the Schumann resonance cavity.

I’m sure there’s more of a distinction between the Earth and ionosphere, than simply being negative and positive charged plates. We don’t refer to the conductor in Foucault’s wheel as being negatively charged, do we? I am of course referring to the Earth acting as the copper disc from his experiment. Also, some refer to the neutrality of the ionosphere. It’s not simply acting as a positive charged plate. The ionosphere is known to be made up with just as many negative ions as positive ions; such a mixture is known as a plasma. Unlike air, plasma conducts electricity, and in-fact, the ionosphere in the polar regions carries large electric currents.

The Earth is in a circuit with the Sun. We can think of the frequency of the EMR from the Sun as being roughly in the region of 0.002Hz. As a further point of interest, I wonder what impact every other star in the Universe has upon the aether? We are no longer dealing with energy that moves a few million miles – but billions. If that energy is able to travel instantaneously, just imagine its velocity, and the whalloping energy behind it! This explains, rather elegantly I think, how the “radiant energy” that is the aether is so imperceptible – it’s travelling too damned fast. We are surrounded by a fluid moving at hyper speeds. The Universe is full of a fluid moving at hyper speeds. Well, what’s going to slow that baby down? A cold energy sink that we call matter. A vortex in the middle of a stream. A cold energy sink which gravitates energy, and then radiates energy. An energy sink that loves to suck up electricity.

One would have to assume that the bottom of the cold energy sink will be at the centre of our planet. I imagine the Earth as a ball rolling around on a blanket of aether. Electricity, it appears, wants to throw itself back into the hyper-stream of the aether, as it gravitates to the bottom of the sink. The aether contracts at the source of the sink, and then expands back out into space. This much condensed magnetism is going to generate magnetic friction, which, as we have so far discovered, generates heat – enough heat to produce molten rock, perhaps?

Many thanks:
http://www.studio7designs.com/downloads/stock-photos/rabbithole.jpg
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=18951558
http://www.phy6.org/Education/Ielect.html
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tmt.htm
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119657299/abstract
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html

A body that absorbs energy is called an energy sink. It appears a prism is acting as a cold energy sink. Cold energy defines the latent magnetism of the aether. The optical density of the glass allows us to see the aether field being distorted, but surely it is the physical density of the prism which creates the distortion. Density is a physical property of matter – it is defined in a qualitive manner as the measure of the relative “heaviness” of objects with a constant volume. Here’s a list of elements by density we can refer to :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_elements_by_density

It’s no surprise that the noble gases are the least dense. Those elements we class as nuclear fuels occupy the part of the list where the elements have the greatest physical density. The precious metals, gold and platinum, are also considered to have a high density.

As a rule of thumb, the index of refraction usually increases as the physical density of the material increases. If the prism, based on its physical density, is acting as a cold energy sink, then what are the similarities with those elements, or materials, that have a high physical density. Is a “heavy” element also acting as a cold energy sink?

The phenomenon of radioactivity is observed in heavy elements such as Uranium. Radioactivity is a process in which unstable nuclei release sub-atomic particles. I imagine radioactivity as the missing link between the vibration of EMR, and the vibration of matter. I’ve heard it said that the nuclear energy available in the Universe is very small. That nuclear energy is not a big thing. What is wanted is the potential energy behind it.

A very small amount of matter is equivalent to a vast amount of energy. For example, 1kg of matter converted completely into energy would be equivalent to the energy released by exploding 22 megatons of TNT. We’ve seen the illusion behind kinetic energy. Can the same understanding be applied to potential energy? If so, it would appear that matter does not store the energy as potential energy, but rather, matter gravitates and radiates all its energy from the aether.

Tesla believed atomic power was an illusion. A quantity of uranium or radium does not produce or generate the alpha /beta /gamma radiation, it simply acts as a transciever of a “…raw primordial form of electrical energy.” Tesla said a great deal of wonderful, fascinating things. He once stated, “There is no energy in matter, other than that recieved from the enviroment.” By enviroment, he is of course refering to the aether. Tesla said that the aether is acted upon by a life giving creative force, and that when the force subsides and motion ceases, matter reverts to the aether (a form of “atomic decay”).

“Every particle of matter is composed of a primary substance–the ether–filling all space. The atom of any elementary body is differentiated from the rest of this tenuous substance merely by a spinning motion like a whirl in a calm lake. By being set in movement ether becomes palpable matter; the movement arrested, the primary substance reverts to its normal state and becomes imperceptible….To create and annihilate material substance, to cause at will its birth and death, would be man’s most consequential deed–his greatest achievement, which would place him
beside his creator, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny. (Nikola Tesla, in a letter to the “Actors Fund Fair”, May 13th, 1907.)

The action of the vortexes of integration and disintegration were again described by Tesla in 1930. “Long ago he [man] recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Akasha or luminiferous ether, which is acted on by the life giving Prana, or creative force, calling into existence in never ending cycles all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance. (Nikola Tesla, “Man’s Greatest Achievement”)

If you’ve got the time, this article where I got the above from is well worth a visit…. It also makes mention of a guy named Walter Russell. http://www.textfiles.com/stories/thewave

“In May of 1921, Walter Russell, a sculptor, painter, and later aPresident of the Academy of Arts and Sciences, entered into a prolonged state of heightened awareness or samadhdi. His experience allowed him to see the manner in which the creator, or illumined one as he described it, gave manifestation to the elements of matter and the gravitational and electrical effects of nature.”

So I followed Walter Russell here….. and I found this …. http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/mysteries/whatsthis/light.html

“All matter is simulated light. Water of the heavens still is water, and it still is light waves. No change whatsoever has taken place between the waters of earth and those of the heavens except a change of its condition from positive to negative preponderance. This change is due solely to a change of its direction in respect to its center of gravity. All dense cold matter, such as iron, stone, wood, and all growing or decaying things, are light. We do not think of them as light but all are waves of motion, and all waves of motion are light. Light is all there is in the spiritual universe of knowing, and simulation of that light in opposite extensions is all there is in the electric wave universe of sensing. The simulation of light in matter is not light. There is no light in matter.”

Many thanks:
http://quanta-gaia.org/dobson/PhysicsOfIllusion.html
http://www.buzzle.com/articles/what-is-radioactivity.htm
http://everything2.com/e2node/index%2520of%2520refraction
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2005-01/1105124199.Ph.r.html
http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/120Adensity.html

If you have an interest (or even only a vague interest) in magnetism, or electricity, then I highly recommend this article. It’s about magnetic current, and appears to have been written in 1945, by Edward Leedskalnin. A charming gem.

“Now I will tell you what magnetic current is. Magnetic current is the same as electric current is a wrong expression. Really it is not one current, they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole individual magnets inconcentrated streams and the other is composed of South Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and they are running one stream against the other stream in whirling, screwlike fashion, and with high speed. One current alone if it be North Pole magnet current or South Pole magnet current it cannot run alone. To run one current will have to run against the other….

You have been wondering why alternating currents can run so far away from their generators. One reason is between every time the currents start and stopthere is no pressure in the wire so the magnets from the air run in the wire and when the run starts there already are magnets in the wire which do nothave to come from the generator, so the power line itself is a small generator which assists the big generator to furnish the magnets for the currents to run with. I have a generator that generates currents on a small scale from the air without using any -magnets around it….

The reason I call the results of North and South Pole magnet’s functions magnetic currents and not electric currents or electricity is the electricity is connected too much with those non-existing electrons. If it had been called magneticity then I would accept it. Magneticity would indicate that it has a magnetic base and so it would be all right.”

http://keelynet.com/unclass/magcurnt.txt